Match Overview

This UEFA Champions League 1st Qualifying Round second leg takes place on 14 July 2026 at 17:30 UTC, with Levski Sofia hosting Borac Banja Luka. The first leg, played on 7 July 2026 in Banja Luka, ended 1-1, meaning the aggregate score is level at 1-1 heading into this decisive home fixture in Sofia.

Because the aggregate is level, the second leg advancement requirements are straightforward and must be stated clearly: any win for either team sends them through outright. A draw after 90 minutes keeps the aggregate level and means extra time will be played, followed by a penalty shootout if necessary. It is critical to note that UEFA abolished the away goals rule from the 2021-22 season onwards — it does not apply here. A 1-1 draw after 90 minutes means extra time regardless of where either goal was scored in the tie.

  • Levski Sofia advance outright if they win this leg by any scoreline (e.g. 1-0, 2-0, 2-1, etc.)
  • Borac Banja Luka advance outright if they win this leg by any scoreline (e.g. 0-1, 0-2, 1-2, etc.)
  • Extra time (and potentially penalties) apply if the second leg ends in any draw — aggregate remains 1-1 (plus whatever is scored tonight), and the level aggregate triggers extra time

Team Analysis

Levski Sofia

Levski Sofia enter this second leg with a record of 0 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses from the data available — entirely reflecting the first leg result. They scored 1 goal and conceded 1 goal in Banja Luka, showing they are capable of finding the net on the road but also susceptible to conceding. As the home side in this second leg, they hold the psychological advantage of playing in front of their own supporters, which could prove significant in a tight tie. League standings data is not available for this preview, so broader domestic context cannot be assessed. Their form is recorded as a single draw (D), which is the first leg result itself.

Borac Banja Luka

Borac Banja Luka mirror Levski's statistical profile exactly — 0 wins, 1 draw, 0 losses, 1 goal scored, and 1 goal conceded. Having secured a 1-1 draw at home in the first leg, they travel to Sofia knowing that a win of any kind advances them. As the away side, they will need to be well-organised defensively while retaining the threat on the counter-attack that allowed them to score in the first encounter. No league standings data is available to provide additional domestic context, and no injury or lineup information has been provided for this preview.

Comparison

Based purely on the available data, both teams are statistically identical entering this second leg. Each has scored once, conceded once, and neither has won or lost a match in this tie. The key differentiator will therefore be home advantage — Levski Sofia play in their own stadium, which historically provides a meaningful boost in high-stakes knockout football. That said, no additional data on home/away records, squad quality, or recent domestic form beyond this tie is available, which limits the depth of comparison significantly. Both sides have demonstrated they can score, and both have shown defensive vulnerability, suggesting an open and competitive contest is likely.

Key Factors

  • Aggregate situation: Tied 1-1 — every goal in this second leg carries maximum significance. Neither team can afford a passive approach.
  • Home advantage for Levski Sofia: Playing in Sofia may give Levski an edge in terms of crowd support and familiarity, particularly if the match goes to extra time.
  • No away goals rule: Both teams must win outright within 90 minutes or through extra time/penalties. A draw after 90 minutes is not a safe result for either side — it leads to extra time, not elimination or advancement for anyone.
  • Attacking intent required: With the aggregate level, both sides are incentivised to attack, which raises the likelihood of goals.
  • Data limitations: No league form beyond this single match, no standings, no injury news, and no lineup data are available. Predictions are therefore based on limited statistical evidence and general principles of knockout football.
  • Mental pressure: Second legs in tight ties often produce cautious openings before one team is forced to commit forward, potentially opening spaces for the other.

Prediction

Main pick: Both Teams to Score — YES. Both sides netted in the first leg and will need to attack to avoid extra time. The conditions favour an open match with goals at both ends.

Alternative pick: Double Chance — Levski Sofia or Draw (i.e., the match goes to extra time). Home advantage gives Levski a slight edge, but Borac showed resilience in the first leg. Backing Levski not to lose in 90 minutes appears reasonable, though not certain.

Over/Under: Leaning Over 1.5 goals. With the aggregate level and both teams needing a win, attacking play is expected. The first leg produced 2 goals total, and the pressure of a second leg at home may open the game up further.

Both Teams to Score: YES — based on the first leg evidence and the tactical necessity for both sides to push forward.

Predicted score: Levski Sofia 2-1 Borac Banja Luka

Aggregate calculation: First leg aggregate — Borac Banja Luka 1, Levski Sofia 1. If second leg ends 2-1 to Levski Sofia, the overall aggregate becomes Levski Sofia 3 – Borac Banja Luka 2. Levski Sofia advance outright.

Confidence level: 4/10 — The data available is extremely limited, covering only a single match between these two clubs. The prediction is based on general knockout football principles, home advantage, and the single head-to-head data point provided. Significant uncertainty remains.

Final Verdict

This second leg promises to be a tense, closely contested knockout tie with the aggregate locked at 1-1. Levski Sofia's home advantage is the primary differentiating factor based on the available data, and they may edge a narrow victory to advance to the next qualifying round. However, Borac Banja Luka demonstrated in the first leg that they are a capable and competitive side, and the outcome could easily go to extra time or beyond. Please gamble responsibly and treat all predictions as informed opinions, not guarantees.