Birmingham vs Wolves: Live Score, Stats & Head-to-Head
Matchweek 5
Full time
J. Stansfield 22'J. Tchatchoua 36' (OG)
F. Lopez 3'L. Krejci 31'
St. Andrew's @ Knighthead Park, Birmingham · Referee: Adam Herczeg, England
Match statistics
Possession
53%
47%
Expected goals (xG)
1.4
1.9
Total shots
16
9
Shots on target
7
4
Corners
8
4
Fouls
17
12
Yellow cards
2
1
Match log
Birmingham·Wolves
- 3'F. LopezAssist: R. Gomes
- J. StansfieldAssist: P. Roberts22'
- 31'L. KrejciAssist: Andre
- J. TchatchouaOwn goal36'
- 51'Marshall MunetsiYellow card
- Christoph KlarerYellow card53'
- Phil NeumannYellow card67'
- 68'M. MunetsiOn: J. James
- 68'R. GomesOn: M. Mane
- L. MillarOn: D. Gray69'
- 76'R. JimenezOn: T. Doyle
- J. StansfieldOn: M. Ducksch81'
- P. RobertsOn: C. Vicente81'
- A. PriskeOn: L. Vazquez81'
- 87'AndreOn: B. Traore
- 87'A. ArmstrongOn: S. Neave
- UnknownOn: E. Laird90+2'
Our prediction
Birmingham vs Wolves Prediction, Odds & Betting Tips
Wolves to Win or Draw · 11 picks
Head-to-head
Sep 06, 2026Birmingham 2–2 WolvesRegular Season - 5
Apr 15, 2018Wolves 2–0 BirminghamRegular Season - 43
Dec 04, 2017Birmingham 0–1 WolvesRegular Season - 20
Feb 24, 2017Wolves 1–2 BirminghamRegular Season - 34
Aug 20, 2016Birmingham 1–3 WolvesRegular Season - 4
Lineups
Birmingham (4-2-3-1)
- 1J. BeadleG
- 26B. Osayi-SamuelD
- 5P. NeumannD
- 4C. KlarerD
- 20A. CochraneD
- 8Paik Seung-HoM
- 24T. IwataM
- 16P. RobertsM
- 28J. StansfieldM
- 17L. MillarM
- 9A. PriskeF
Wolves (4-2-3-1)
- 1J. SaG
- 38J. TchatchouaD
- 34N. DjigaD
- 37L. KrejciD
- 3H. BuenoD
- 7AndreM
- 5M. MunetsiM
- 21R. GomesM
- 28F. LopezM
- 10A. ArmstrongM
- 9R. JimenezF
Our predictions
✓ WonFull analysis →
EFL Championship · 02:32 PM
AI model
Birmingham vs Wolves
1.37Wolves to Win or Draw
75%
AI model · Marcus Volt
AI PersonaModel predictions
LLM League table →8 of 8 models: Wolves to Win
CLClaude Opus 4.840%✕CSClaude Sonnet 542%✕GPGPT-539%✕DSDeepSeek V4 Pro42%✕GKGrok 4.641%✕KMKimi K2.642%✕QWQwen3 Max42%✕GMGemini 3.1 Pro39%✕CFCoin-flip Baseline62%✕
Model names are trademarks of their respective owners — independent research, not an official benchmark.